<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boycott Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idiolect.org.uk/notes/?feed=rss2&#038;p=679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idiolect.org.uk/notes/?p=679</link>
	<description>ideas are the new oil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:34:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hubert</title>
		<link>http://idiolect.org.uk/notes/?p=679&#038;cpage=1#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 08:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idiolect.truth.posiweb.net/notes/?p=679#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Remind me that we have to talk about monks next time we meet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remind me that we have to talk about monks next time we meet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://idiolect.org.uk/notes/?p=679&#038;cpage=1#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idiolect.truth.posiweb.net/notes/?p=679#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Good questions. I think the issue of when to engage is mainly determined by which action gives you the most leverage for change, subjective and difficult to assess, although this is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions. I think the issue of when to engage is mainly determined by which action gives you the most leverage for change, subjective and difficult to assess, although this is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://idiolect.org.uk/notes/?p=679&#038;cpage=1#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idiolect.truth.posiweb.net/notes/?p=679#comment-617</guid>
		<description>So what makes academic publishers involved in the arms trade different than candles made of human fat? I agree that sometimes boycotts are appropriate, and sometimes working within the system is appropriate. There&#039;s no substitute for good judgment,  but is there anything we can say about how to draw the line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what makes academic publishers involved in the arms trade different than candles made of human fat? I agree that sometimes boycotts are appropriate, and sometimes working within the system is appropriate. There&#8217;s no substitute for good judgment,  but is there anything we can say about how to draw the line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
