British medical journal has an extended debate on the ethics of Reed Elsevier’s involvement in the arms trade, here.
Email me
tom[at]idiolect[dot]org[dot]uk
Tweets from @tomstafford
- RT @danlockton: 'Making a game out of email' by @stephenanderson on @johnnyholland http://bit.ly/dqxe6h 19 hrs ago
- RT @mocost: Analysis of citation patterns over the past decade shows how neuroscience has matured as a discipline http://j.mp/cPzIoC 19 hrs ago
- .@carlzimmer @vaughanbell overhaul of mindhacks.com is in pipeline - will sort out loading issues hopefully! in reply to carlzimmer 4 days ago
- More updates...
Posting tweet...
Powered by Twitter Tools
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Links for January 2010
- Beat the winter blues the Velten way
- Quote #251: What man can make of man
- Dan: "No theory changes what it is a…
- Tom Walton: I love: "But no theory changes what…
- The technology of our wiser, wider, selves
- Quote #249
- Do you dream of being chased?
- allen rand: Next one I get I'll probably be…
Categories
Archives
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
0 Responses to “Debate on Elsevier in pages of BMJ”