- US strategy of preemptive use of nuclear weapons Of course, if you nuke the ‘WMDs’ then not finding them after inspection doesn’t look so suspicious…
- ‘You are now chatting with god’
- Robin Cook’s resignation speech
- ‘George Bush Doesn’t Care About Black People’ Kanye West goes off-script on NBC
- George Bush Doesn’t Care About Black People.mp3
- it’s Pirate Jesus!
- it’s Giant Squid!
- songmeanings.net – where i learnt that ‘Old Soul Song’ by Bright Eyes is about the anti-war demo in New York on 15th of February 2003
- ‘Anyone here think they know what a tough guy is?’
- Gloria Steinem is excellent in the Guardian
- Adblock is so cool. Removing all the adverts from my browsing restores a sense of calm i didn’t know i’d lost
Author: tom
DSEi finishes today. We’ve had some successes in the campaign to get it stopped. I’m still thinking about the Elsevier angle, and what the next step is for academics who’d like Elsevier to stop involving them in the arms trade (thanks everyone who provided feedback on this, here, at CT, and in person).
I think academics are well placed to persuade Elsevier to stop organising arms fairs. As a group, we’re generally easily convinced of the morality of the affair (‘What? These guys publish medical journals but also assist in the sale of cluster bombs and illegal torture equipment?!‘), and also we fill, review, edit and purchase their journals. Question is, of course, how do we persuade them? After discussion and thought, here’s what i think the answer is: We’re going to ask them. That’s right, i suspected i was a liberal, now i’m certain of it. Elsevier have a reputation (and a customer base) to lose. Even if they believed their own arguments that it isn’t immoral to organise these arms fairs, there’s no reason why they need to keep organising them.
I think the two main things to do next are:
1. Raise awareness of Elsevier’s links to the arms trade
2. Encourage individuals and organisations to contact Elsevier about this
It’s not just university academics who can be reached either. There’s all the medics (Elsevier publish nearly 800 medical journals); the teacher’s (which use Elsevier products in the classes – I wonder what the AUT would think of all this?); the Lawyers (who use an Elsevier product, Lexis Nexis, to access case law); the social workers (there’s a flagship journal for social workers ‘Community Care’ published by Elsevier). And then there’s the librarians. Bless the librarians. If the librarians are against you, you’ve really got problems.
Anyway, so i think i’m clear on what i’d like to do now. It’s just the doing it. Enter period of letter writing, union motions, publicity chasing etc. If you’d like to help, or you know of any group with an interest in Elsevier please get in touch. tom [at] idiolect [dot] org [dot] uk
The Lancet letter, and the accompanying editorial (my post about this, full text, on indymedia) got good coverage: The New York Times, Today programme, ABC (Aus), Ottawa Sun (Ca), Pravda (Ru), The Australian, The Daily Telegraph, The Sunday Times, The Independent, BBC News Online, The Statesman, The Times, Vancouver Sun, Associated Press Newswires and The Guardian (that i know of)
The march on tuesday was successful for what it was. BBC coverage. Direct action today and yesterday has caused lots of disruption, amid a typically overwhelming police response – indymedia. And in the news today: BAE systems has been funding Pinochet, which seems in character.
Quote #110
The mind is not a vessel to be filled,
but a fire to be lighted!
Plutarch
links for sept 11th 2005
- Theatre of the Emerging American Moment. Clunky write-up, great plays.
- The sociology of disasters (discussion on CT about New Orleans)
- Yeppies, the generation Y equivalent of the yuppiese ‘less single-mindedly materialistic than their predecessors, but their style is every bit as consumerist.’
- What benefits has medical research on animals had? (The Guardian. Includes a list)
- Dawkins on intelligent design ‘in a class on 20th-century European history, who would demand equal time for the theory that the Holocaust never happened?’
- World’s top 100 Universities (I work at number 65)
- What kind of man would go to occupied Baghdad to set up a newspaper?
- Mix drinks. Make cocktails. Be Careful
- oldversion.com ‘because newer is not always better’
- Ben Goldacre’s Guardian ‘Bad Science’ column now has it’s own website
- Okay, so the revolution will be televised
In the latest edition of the Lancet an editorial calls for their publisher, Reed Elsevier, to cut its ties with the arms trade.
There’s a letter in the same issue (signed by me amongst others) saying the same thing, and a response letter from Elsevier. They say what they’ve said to me previously, although they left out the bit about respecting my right to think they are immoral profiteers and they’ll keep doing what they want thank you very much (i paraphrase).
I was asked by a journalist what I thought of their response. Here’s what I said (and this applies to both their response published in the Lancet and their response to me personally which I put up on the blog):
Running this kind of arms fair may be legal, but it isn’t moral and it certainly isn’t appropriate for a scientific and medical publisher. I suspect that the majority of scientists and medics would not want to be associated with this aspect of Reed Elsevier’s activities – the Editors of the Lancet certainly don’t.
Secondly, the defense industry may be vital to democracy and humanitarian missions, but the way the arms trade currently conducts itself is notoriously poorly regulated, unaccountable and secretive. The history of the sale of illegal technologies, of unethical technologies (such as the cluster bombs the Lancet editors make mention of) and sale of weapons to countries with poor human rights records exemplifies this. These abuses will continue at DSEi 2005, and Elsevier makes itself complicit in them.
Elsevier is putting profit above humanitarian values – just like the arms trade as a whole.
The story is covered by The Guardian
I’ve been corresponding with the publishers Reed Elsevier about their involvement in the arms trade. Reed Elsevier is an academic publisher, which also has a subsidary company, Spearhead Exhibitions, which hosts DSEi – the world’s largest arms fair. You can see what I’ve written to Reed Elsevier, and what they’ve written back, elsewhere on this blog (one, two, three, four).
I believe that the DSEi arms fairs are immoral, geopolitically reckless, sometimes illegal (e.g.) and improperly regulated (e.g.). Beyond this, I resent that a publisher which profits from the hard (and publicly funded) work of academics uses those profits to support the sale to undemocratic & repressive governments of such things as depleted uranium shells, cluster bombs, missile technology and small arms. The arms fairs Spearhead organises (yes, DSEi isn’t the only one) are a measly amount of Elsevier’s business, but it is a part that makes academics complicit in the deaths of civilians, in torture and in political repression around the world.
What can academics do to pressure Elsevier to drop this part of their business? What should we do? Here’s some possibilities. Feedback very welcome – which of these, if any, are reasonable, feasible and might be effective?
1. Write to the Chairman of Elsevier, Jan Hommen, and ask him to reconsider his position: Jan Hommen, Reed Elsevier PLC, 1-3 Strand, London WC2N 5JR.
2. Contact your union, and/or support any motions which express disaproval of Reed Elsevier.
3. If you are member of a scientific society which produces a journal, find out who the publisher is. If it is Elsevier, find out when the contract renewal date is, and the procedure for society members to influence the decision of who that contract goes to.
4. If you write journal papers, bear in the mind the publisher when submitting papers. Obviously you aren’t going to withhold submitting a paper just because the journal is Elsevier, but if you are faced with a choice of journals, one of which is Elsevier, you could cross that journal off your list first?
5. For your papers published in Elsevier journals, insert a line in the acknowledgements along the lines of “The author(s) note with disappointment the involvement of Elsevier with the international trade in arms”
6. When reviewing papers bear in mind the publisher of the journal. Put those for the Elsevier journals to the bottom of the pile.
Any more?
Update – Manual Trackback: Crooked Timber
Letters on Katrina
Letters in the Guardian on the situation in New Orleans, here. Including this one:
Donald Rumsfeld declared the looting in Iraq following “liberation” to be the consequence of “the pent-up feelings that result from decades of oppression”. We await his wisdom on New Orleans.
Chris Mazeika
London
Links for 21st of August 2005
- A good summary of why latex is better than word for academics (or anyone producing large documents with figures or equations in).
- Andrew Robert’s Latex tutorials
- ‘Someone who enjoys their job will spread happiness around. The more successful you are, the more testosterone you produce. And if you are good at what you do, it?s more likely to be “Hey ? let?s party”‘
- Newsfromnowhere.org.uk – radical and community bookshop. Does online ordering. Like amazon, but wearing black.
- New GO SHEFFO website. Still the coolest fanzine in the world, and now with a more usable website
- In 1649 To St George’s Hill A ragged band they called the Diggers Came to show the people’ s will
- Guardian profile of Robert Trivers by Andrew Brown
- Free party in Utah shut down by the army – these guys were so busted. SWAT, helicopters, assault rifles, tear gas, beatings.
- The Central Limit Theorum (with cool applets)
- Things I hate in other people’s seminars – ‘the speakers clearly considered their presentation as therapy for themselves rather than a communications exercise with the audience’.
Edinburgh Round-up
For what it’s worth…
friday>
Puppetry of the Penis – After the guys had taken their clothes off: “I really hope no one in the audience is thinking ‘So where are the puppets'”
saturday
Switch Triptych – From the Riot Group who stirred controversy with their ‘Anti-war’ Pugalist Specialist. Set in a telephone exchange, circa 1919, and circling themes of modernity, corporatism and mechanisisation. Excellent stuff
The Exonerated – Made from the real testimony of six people wrongfully convicted, sent to death row and later exonerated. If it is possible for something to be extremely moving and also cheap – in the sense of too easy – this is it.
Shane Koyczan – Performance poet. A-maz-ing. A cross between ani difranco and leonard cohen.
sunday
Dick Taverne, ‘Science and Society’ – Promoting his new book ‘The March of Unreason’, Dick rails agains the rising tide of irrationality and emphasises the fundamental entanglement of science and democracy. Fair nuff, but i think he’s a little unfair to those who buy into things he views as nonsense. Getting the proper scientific low-down on a topic is reserved for a privilaged view – privilaged in terms of time, and in terms of education/enculturation. Dick might have time to read 2,400 page reports on climate change, but most of us don’t. To say “We know this is nonsense, this-and-that many respectable scientific authorities say it is” is insufficient for those of us trying to make sense of things without the privilages of time and position that enable us to look into it fully, and it’s also profoundly undemocratic, since his injunction to believe the scientific establishment basically amounts to the same old mantra of “Leave it to the chief, trust authority, don’t think for yourself”. Oh and he also said that organic farming is a con, pesticide residues are harmless (so why do people get Parkinson’s Disease?) and that no one in the developing world opposed globalisation. What, no one?!
Give up! Start Over! (In the darkest of times i think of Richard Nixon) – A sweaty, physical, cut-up of speeches by richard nixon, Baudrillard’s Simulacra and Simulation and ‘Reality TV – An Inside’s Guide’. This is an intense work-out/meditation on the construction of reality and celebrity in our television culture. Left my head so full i had to sit and do nothing for about the next three hours. Just blew me away. “Be yourself. Or the most easily typecast version of yourself” “Your fifteen minutes – or point two megabytes -of fame” “In the language of intimacy”
Poppycock! – passed the time
A thousand natural shocks – Give up! Start over! was so good i went to the other show by the same group, which seemed to have less center to it, and hence (at points) descended into the kind of avant-garde theatre it would be just impossible to paraody
Rob Newmnan , Apocalypso Now – Bill Hicks meets chomsky. Good god this man is funny and clever. Perhaps the second best thing i saw after Give up! Start over!. “If you’ve nothing to hide you’ve nothing to fear – or, as it is also known, everyone who is worried about being persecuted should be perscuted” “I’m not saying it was the cause for war, just a cause for war – part of a nexus of loosely connected interacting causal forces. That’s my new catchphrase”
Radioshow – showing sometime on radio four in the 11pm comedy slot. Was funny
Er…that’s it for shows. I drunk a load of booze and black coffee too. Edinburgh is way cool – it’s like the Berlin of the UK, I could definitely live there.
Edinburgh Fringe Festival
I’m going to the Edinburgh Fringe Festival over the bank holiday weekend at the end of this month. Does anybody have any recommendations for shows I should try and see?
combustion engine snuff
As oil depletion speeds up, motor racing will be made illegal. Upon it will fall the moral censure which must accompany the change in our society’s relationship to fossil fuels. Motor sports will come to play a cultural role somewhere between bare-knuckle boxing and ascot: a barbaric, contraband, relic- but also the preserve of the very rich. Video footage of races will be the new snuff movies. Policemen will capture stocks in raids, and watch them in fascination before having them destroyed. “Christ Jim, look at the speed of that” “Think of the fuel it must be burning!”
Links for 19th of August 2005
- ‘Beyond Belief’ Justin Cartwright is violently secular in the Guardian
- George Monbiot finds the belief that we are incipient compost strangely comforting (and also discusses new evidence for the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis)
- She Falls – the strangest thing (via kev)
- Political comedy makes a comeback at Edinburgh festival
- ‘Well, sir.. the day afor yestidday, I spent the whole day gatherin’ up them ballots. Them folks who had given the matter a little thought handed the ballots back all crumpled up. Them folks who had given the matter a lot of thought told me they lost theirs. Them folks what had talked it over with their wimmen-folk sicked their dogs on me.’
- ‘at that moment everybody was nobody’ (Have A Cup of Tea)
- The only black organization that exposes and opposes lesbian feminism witchcraft!! (‘teaching the black man how to claim, tame, train and dominate the black woman to make her his queen once again’)
- ‘Always wanted to live in a country people flee for fear of religious persecution? Then congratulations, we finally made it. Great news for me, of course – writers get hit just after the minorities’ (AL Kennedy in the Guardian)
- Lab grown meat product will be bland and tasteless, like real chicken nuggets
- What is the science behind advertiser’s ‘scientific’ claims?
- Sam Woolf’s chicken video is here
First Against The Wall
Dude, I just googled “First against the wall” and the top hit was this, the wikipedia entry for Karl Rove. Karl Rove is George W. Bush’s senior advisor, chief political strategist, and deputy chief of staff in charge of policy!
Memorable Quotes from Fight Club (1999)
Narrator: I want you to listen to me very carefully, Tyler.
Tyler Durden: Okay…
Narrator: My eyes are open.
[the Narrator puts the gun into his mouth and pulls trigger]
Not much posting cos i’m on holiday, ain’t i. Festival fun in devon this weekend:
email problems
If you sent me email between the 3rd of August (wednesday) and 8th of august (today, monday), then i may not have got it because my email arrived all stripped of senders and contents (great). I’ve no idea why, but please be understanding if i don’t get back to you about something you sent me…
links for 3rd of august
- ‘Was it fair of me to get laughs out of the suggestion that Jeffrey Archer was a dreadfully vulgar, lying egomaniac who wrote crappy books and deserved prison? OK, bad example.’
- Guardian review of ‘Festival’ (which is a great film)
- Intelligent discussion of surveillance technology and civil liberties at CT
- The Straight Dope on subliminal pictures in advertising
- Snopes on the subliminal popcorn sales myth
- Proof that CAAT really scare the arms industry (and that some people on message boards are idiots, but that’s incidental)
- Intelligent and well designed criticism of intelligent design (Cosma Shalizi)
- ‘Giblets you have shattered my reasoned and ordered worldview into a thousand splintering pieces with your hammer of unyielding truth!’ (more on intelligent design)
- Matt is dazzling & gnostic once more: on games
- Like a daily self-improvement plan, but designed by Chuck Palahniuk: one, two
There is a human bias to underestimate the role we play in creating our own circumstances (this is part of the ‘Fundamental Attribution Error’). I wonder also if there is an opposite bias to underestimate the effect that our circumstances have on us. If there is, what is it called?
Either way, I think both (putative) biases can be explained by perceptual selectivity and an adapted mind. It’s easier and more useful to notice how our circumstances affect things than how unchanging aspects of ourselves do. Contrawise, it’s hard to notice slow changes that our circumstances have on ourselves.
the grace that others have inside
And do you sometimes lust
For the grace that others have inside
The simple peace they make with life
Yet filled up like some summer’s night?
‘I see the light’, Cracker, as heard not as sung
links for 21st of July 2005
- The center of gravity, the decisive terrain in this war is the vast majority of people who are not directly involved but whose support, willing or coerced, is necessary to insurgent operations around the world” The War on Terror is like The War on Subs would have been in WWII
- Networked Europe (those two via, via, Interconnected)
- Who killed Richard Cullen? Jon Ronson on the man who killed himself over ?130,000 of credit card debt
- How do the police keep going in hectic times like this? Listen to Chief Commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Sir Ian Blair, speaking on radio 4 (MP3, 460 KB, funny, silly, sorry).
- Desktop Search Comparison – Google vs. Copernic
- Possibly the coolest conference in the world
- Guardian article about Russian politics and democratic deficit
- Gloomy Sunday – the notorious ‘Hungarian Suicide Song’ – was written in 1933 and banned from the playlists of major radio broadcasters around the world for being too depressing (and reading the lyrics I can see why)
- When i was a child, i was constantly terrified that my life was just a story being read by King Babar to his children
- Cosma Shalizi on some new methods for adumbrating epistemic communities
- Stunning photoblog
- The 14 identifying characteristics of fascism (any similarlity to governments near you is disturbing)
Stephen J. Cowden
General Council & Company Secretary
Reed Elsevier
1-3 Strand
London, WC2N 5JR
21 July 2005
Dear Mr Cowden
Thanks for your reply (12 July) to my letter of 29th of June. I asked three questions in my letter:
Will Elsevier stop helping to organise arms fairs, specifically DSEi (next scheduled for September 2005)? How does your involvement in the arms trade square with your playing ‘a positive role in our local and global communities’? How should the members of academic and medical communities feel about this involvement?
You answered the first, with a straight ‘no’. I’d still like to know the answer to these two:
How does your involvement in the arms trade square with your playing ‘a positive role in our local and global communities’? How should the members of academic and medical communities feel about this involvement?
And to this I’ll add another:
How can you say believe that sufficient “rigorous checks” are made on the exhibitors at DSEi and that their activities are “legitimate” when illegal activities, such as the sale of landmines (banned by international convention) have been shown, repeatedly, to be organised at DSEi? [1]. Are you able to provide details of the checks that your organisation carried out on exhibitors?
I look forward to hearing from you
Yours
Tom Stafford
Endnote:
[1] http://www.caat.org.uk/campaigns/dsei/dsei-2003-report/landmines.php
I’m not a socialist – but I agree with their point that markets will tend to seek efficiencies without respect for human dignity and well-being. I’m not a libertarian – but I agree with their point that the state will tend to aggregate power to itself, necessarily trampling on the freedoms of the individual. It seems to me like the key issue here is that of beaurocratic diffusion of responsibility – whether that diffusion happens in a multinational corporation or at the level of (inter)national government. The problem is only going to get more pressing as the connections between economies, polities and societies becomes more and more multiple, distal and diverse. The globalisation of markets requires the globalisation of responsibility, but at the same time makes personal responsibility near impossible. Time for radical new political solutions? No – time for radical old political solutions. The issues have got more tangled, but they were pretty tangled at the birth of modernity anyway. There’s enough old fashioned corruption, fascism, exploitation and war around that we can still get milage out of boring things like democracy, seperation of powers, the rule of law, human rights, welfare and free trade – despite all their problems and internal contradictions.
Oh, dammit. I wanted to say something about the diffusion of responsibility (remember Milgram! remember Asch! remember Arendt!) and i’ve ended up thinking about the Enlightenment foundations of political philosophy. Hmm. So. Anyone got any ideas of how to deal with the moral impact of the diffusion of responsibility in complex socities?
Excitingly, Andy Brown’s photography website www.envioustime.co.uk has been updated. Stop by for some excellent documentary, portrait and music photography.
My friend Cat now has her photos at www.cathrynbardsley.co.uk, and I’ve put my photos back on-line, here (what, you didn’t notice they were down?), including the burning man photos. Hugh & Matt’s photos from Nepal/Thailand are also back up after space-shortage made me take them down as well.
I wrote to Elsevier to ask them about their involvement with the arms trade. Their response is below (and as PDF here, 600 KB). They only answered the first of my three questions (with a ‘no’).
Frankly, just because something is legal doesn’t make it legitimate and anyway I find hard to believe that adequate checks are carried out at DSEi, especially given that we know it has, just for a first example, repeatedly haboured the brokering of illegal sales of landmines. I’ll be writing back to Elsevier, and in a few days I’ll post it that here too.
Making words needed
Part of any good advice on writing is to cut everything that isn’t doing some work. As the classic says ‘Omit needless words’, ‘Vigourous writing is concise’.
It occurs to me that sometimes, especially with scientific writing, that rather than have a choice of what to include and what to omit, you have a fixed number of ideas to include and your task, as a writer, is the mirror of the maxim above. Rather than ‘omit needless words’ you must find a way to make needed the words/ideas you are compelled to include. Any advice on how to do this would be appreciated.
Links for 16th of July 2005
- ‘This is not a love song’: I can stop thinking about you. /
You don’t drive me crazy. / I guess we had fun / but the details are hazy. - Why the Bombings Mean That We Must Support My Politics
- ‘Very few people here believe they hate us for our freedoms. We think they hate us because our armies are in their countries.’ (Andrew Brown on salon.com)
- Bruce Mau: An Incomplete Manifesto for Growth
- An addictive waste of time
- the best card trick in the world (involves information theory)
- Fox News: ‘the BBC almost operates as a foreign registered agent of Hezbollah and some of the other jihadist groups’ Roger Mosey, head of BBC Television News: ‘If I may leave our customary impartiality aside for a moment, the comments made on Fox News are beneath contempt.’
- an alternative to national service – the Crap Year
- What Bin Laden wants and why he wants it (he says)
- Was it the “very diversity, that melting pot aspect of London” that Islamist extremists found so offensive that they wanted to kill innocent civilians in Britain’s capital, Marr wondered. “No, it’s not that,” replied Gardner briskly, who is better acquainted with al-Qaida thinking than most. “What they find offensive are the policies of western governments and specifically the presence of western troops in Muslim lands, notably Iraq and Afghanistan.
A human network syndrome?
Dan wrote me a comment on my post on modelling local economies and the effect of shops which generate more income but send profits outside the local economy. It’s quite long so I’ve put most of it below the fold. Some context may be found from this post i’ve linked to before, by Dan at Indymedia.org.uk, about the
redevelopment plans current for Burngreave, Sheffield. Even if you’re not interested in redevelopment policy, there’s stuff about the utility and use of simulations that has general interest
Some abbreviations i’m not sure he defines: LM3 = Local Multiplier 3, a measure developed by the NEF which gauges how much of money spent in the local economy stays in the local economy. NEF = The New Economics Foundation. ABM = Agent Based Modelling. ODPM = Office of Deputy Prime Minister.
Anyway, Dan says:
This is all a bit like wading through underbrush at the moment. One day in the future, the concepts we’re trying to get at may emerge from the murk, but for now….
1. The value of modeling
2. A human network syndrome?
3. Capitalism, network breakdown
Links for 7th of July 2005
- The Very Model of a Modern Labour Minister
- If not the King, then at least the Prince of Lies
- Classic paper in psychiatry:
Rosenhan, D. (1975) On being sane in insane places. Science, 179, 250-8. - US Military: Guantanamo quite nice after all, ping-pong and ice-cream (for one in five)
- Pedagogy, Lobachevsky & Mathematics
- George Bush’s Inbox circa September 2003
- Our kev in The Times on ‘real poverty’
- Best practice for analysing large data sets
- Filezilla open source FTP package
- Priest who crucified a nun to death: ‘i don’t understand why journalists are making such a fuss’