Links for 24th of August 2005
quote #161
I am very interested in words, and what we have words for and what we haven’t got words for. For instance, the word “paranoia.” It always seems very strange to me that we have this word which means, in effect, that someone feels that he is being persecuted when the people who are persecuting him don’t think that he is. But we haven’t got a word for the condition in which you are persecuting someone without realizing it, which I would have thought is as serious a condition as the other, and certainly no less common.
RD Laing
On this bridge, Lorca warns: Life is not a dream, beware, and beware, and beware. And so many think because then happened, now isn’t. But didn’t I mention? The ongoing WOW is happening right NOW. We are all co-authors of this dancing exuberance, for even our inabilities are having a roast. We are the authors of ourselves, co-authoring a gigantic Dostoevsky novel starring clowns… An assumption developed that you cannot understand life and live life simultaneously. I do not agree entirely, which is to say, I do not exactly disagree. I would say that life understood is life lived. But, the paradoxes bug me, and I can learn to love and make love to the paradoxes that bug me, and on really romantic evenings of self, I go salsa dancing with my confusion. Before you drift off, don’t forget, which is to say remember, because remembering is so much more a psychotic activity than forgetting: Lorca, in that same poem, said that the Iguana will bite those who do not dream, and as one realizes that one is a dream figure in another person’s dream… that is self-awareness!
Timothy ‘Speed’ Levich in Waking Life
There are two kinds of sufferers in this world: those who suffer from a lack of life and those who suffer from an overabundance of life. I’ve always found myself in the second category. When you come to think of it, almost all human behavior and activity is not essentially any different from animal behavior. The most advanced technologies and craftsmanship bring us, at best, up to the super-chimpanzee level. Actually, the gap between, say, Plato or Nietzsche and the average human is greater than the gap between that chimpanzee and the average human. The realm of the real spirit, the true artist, the saint, the philosopher, is rarely achieved. Why so few? Why is world history and evolution not stories of progress but rather this endless and futile addition of zeroes. No greater values have developed. Hell, the Greeks 3,000 years ago were just as advanced as we are. So what are these barriers that keep people from reaching anywhere near their real potential? The answer to that can be found in another question, and that’s this: Which is the most universal human characteristic – fear or laziness?
Louis Mackey, in the same
Reed Elsevier arms trade petition
www.idiolect.org.uk/elsevier/ is now live:
“Reed Elsevier is a publishing company with an arms trade problem. While the bulk of their business is in scientific, medical and educational publishing, they also organise arms fairs around the world. The aim of this website is to mobilise the academic community that writes and reads Reed Elsevier’s journals to persuade them to stop organising arms fairs.”
More details and petition here: http://www.idiolect.org.uk/elsevier/petition.php
Please pass the message on to academics, researchers and postgraduates
Professor R. Appleblossom

I met Matthew Watkins in a field in Somerset, where he was sitting beneath a sign saying “Free Maths Information”. He’s a musicomathematical nomad (or is that a mathemusical itinerant?) with some interesting ideas about the connection between the distribution of prime numbers and fundamental physics. Maths pages here (includes many interesting side notes, such as this essay by Philip K Dick). Music pages here and here (and make sure you check this out). More Big Green pictures here.
Quote #158
It is a grave but not important error that I happen to be a woman … I would really have been a very something man, and as a woman I am truly only a nuisance, only a problem … I am going to make the most of it and not let this biological accident hamper me any more than is necessary. I can resign myself to anything on earth except dullness.
Martha Gellhorn – quoted in a review of her collected letters
Links for 8th August
- Pixresizer is an awesome little app for resizing batches of photos (Windows)
- MASH and the Struggle of Life Against Death
- If the world’s wealth were divided equally, how much would each of us have? (the straight dope)
- Bush gropes Merkel – the press say ‘she asked for it’
- Lest we forget Tristram Hunt in the Guardian
on the nation’s failure to celebrate our radical history - ‘And humanities graduates in the media, who suspect themselves to be intellectuals, desperately need to reinforce the idea that science is nonsense: because they’ve denied themselves access to the most significant developments in the history of western thought for 200 years, and secretly, deep down, they’re angry with themselves over that.’ The paradoy theory of science journalism, from Ben Goldacre’s award-winning “Don’t Dumn Me Down” article
- A simple Coasian test for some kinds of economic bollocks CT article knocking Slate’s ‘Everyday Economics’ columnist (which also contains the wonderful quote ‘This is argument by hypothetical revealed preference , a favourite device of economists when talking about people with lives wildly different to their own but who are not interesting enough to do proper research on.’
- ‘In essence, the theorem states that in the absence of transaction costs, all government allocations of property are equally efficient, because interested parties will bargain privately to correct any externality.’ Wikipedia article on Coase’s Theorum.
- ‘one way of stating Coase’s insight is that the problem is not really due to externalities at all, but to transaction costs. If there were externalities but no transaction costs there would be no problem, since the parties would always bargain to the efficient solution. When we observe externality problems (or other forms of market failure) in the real world, we should ask not merely where the problem comes from, but what the transaction costs are that prevent it from being bargained out of existence.’ (David Friedman)
- Robert M. Young’s Ideal curriculum for a psychology degree
- Free fonts!
- Goddammit if this ain’t the truth. Speaking of which: Atheist vitriol (quotes)
Quote #157
You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.
– Buckminster Fuller
the faustian pact
Now we must confront something even more perplexing: next to the Communist Manifesto, the whole body of capitalist apologetics, from Adam Ferguson to Milton Friedman is remarkably pale and empty of life. The celebrants of capitalism tell us surprisingly little of its infinite horizons, its revolutionary audacity, its dynamic creativity, its adventurousness and romance, its capacity to make men not only more comfortable but more alive.
Marshall Berman in ‘All that is solid melts into air: the experience of modernity’
the loophole woman
It can be fun to feel exceptional – to be the loophole woman, to have a whole power thing, to be an honorary man. But if you are the exception that proves the rule, and the rule is that women are inferior, you haven’t made any progress.
Ariel Levy in ‘Female Chauvinist Pigs’
privacy and advantage
I was speaking to Jess last week, who is a biotechnological law ethicist. She said “What is privacy? What kind of thing is it? Why do we want it?”. I said – and I don’t know if I entirely believe this, but it is what came out – privacy is a concern to keep things unknown so as to protect future advantage. Some things we don’t want others to find out because it might disadvantage us in the future. Because there is no use only keeping important things secret – if you did this it gives away what is an isn’t important, which is half of the advantage. The other factor which works to bring things into the realm of privacy is that the future is uncertain. You can’t know with any precision what will and won’t be decisive in the future, so you need to keep more private now, just in case. One of the proximate mechanisms that results from the (evolutionary) logic of privacy is embarrassment. Just because, I claim, privacy is a result of supra-personal logic doesn’t mean that it isn’t a real human need, nor, for that matter that there shouldn’t be legal protections against our embarrassment.
Links for a better today
- Lyrebird mimicking camera shutters, car alarms, chainsaws…awesome
- Critical review of philip ball’s book ‘Critical Mass’
- Schultz & Webb bring you The Availabot!
- countryx.org – a new virtual country, based loosely on the idea of the university
- object based attention modulates stroop effect
- ‘irony is social chess, the playful manipulation of lazy expectations’ (slate.com article about comedian Sarah Silverman)
- The Age of Irony Comes to an End Why 9/11 means people will start to take things seriously again (Roger Rosenblatt)
- Nature’s top 50 science blogs
- Technorati Rank of mindhacks.com
- allconsuming.org.uk blog for a book that is being written about shopping and politics
- Marriage hacks!
- List of banned or censored books (including revealing bans by provincial american libraries)
- Professor Pressured To Sleep With Student For Good Course Evaluation (the onion)
transformative education
In my department we grade degrees based on four sets of exams – two in the second year, and two in the third year. In the University it is standard to assess students across the bulk of their courses like this. The alternative, which I presume used to happen at my University, and still does in some places such as Oxford and Cambridge, is to assess students in one set of finals at the very end of their courses. I can see that having one set of finals like this is a harsh discipline – especially for those who find exams stressful. Continuous assessment feels ‘fairer’ somehow.
Lately, however, I’ve been wondering if finals might be in fact be fairer, and might be based on a more inspiring model of what happens at a University. Continuous assessment seems to imply that students are receptacles, being filled with knowledge, regurgitating that knowledge at each stage and being assessed on their ability to do this at each point. Conversely, finals express the hope that education will be transformative. Over their time a student will be changed so that they can do some things, things which they were unable to do previously. Assessment on their final ability says ‘we are interested in what you have become, not what you were. We care what you are now able to do, not what you were once unable to do’.
Continuous assessment seems to discriminate against those who get the most out of University education – rewarding those who have been fortunate to grasp the essential model of absorbing and reformulating abstract information before they arrive.
the relegation
It’s a convention to say that the scientific discovery has progressively pushed man further and further from the center of the universe. Galileo displaced the fixed earth from the center and set it revolving around. Now we see the sun itself as a minor light in the backreaches of a single galaxy on the edges of a cluster of glaxies, all of which are hurtling away from each other so that more and more of the black-loneliness of space seperates us from the rest of the universe and from the explosion-point of the universe’s origin. After the Englightenment, God died of neglect and obscelenscence (was Nietzsche really the first to notice?). Without God, in whose image are we made, and on whose authority are we privilaged above all other life? Darwin put us on the same level as the animals, provided a mechanism for our blind creation from the forces of time, chance and selection. The Crick, Watson and the neo-darwinists showed that it is not even us that evolved and still competes to evolve – it is out genes. Our bodies, and by extension the totality of our thoughts and souls, mere ‘lumbering survival machines’ in Dawkin’s mememoral phrase. This is the modern universe. Feel small, feel very small.
But it occurs to me there is another way to look at it. With each relegation, the necessity of man’s existence becomes less and less certain. Because we are no longer required, we become like an unrepeatable moment of time. Because of this we must treasure our existence all the more. (Who else will treasure it for us?). An old testament submission to fate is now outdated, stoic resignation is unacceptable both for individuals and for the species. It is suddenly far more important that we survive, for ourselves rather than for some grand design of which we are the central part. We may not longer be as substantive – foam on the crest of the wave of causality – but we have become infinitely more precious for our pecariousness.
freedom in the usa
Holy Crap! Why is so much of the US population in prison!? Both relative to other ‘basically well-functioning advanced capitalist democracies’:
(This from Crooked Timber post)
And relative to the the US of 25 years ago:
(from Martin Sereno’s presentation on Peak Oil.)
While we’re at it, here’s another slide which Sereno labelled ‘the beginning of corporate planet’.
(of course, although some would like it to be, what’s true for the US isn’t necessarily true for the rest of the planet)
Links for 2nd of July 2006
- ‘The Outiders’ article about ‘high IQ’ and social maladjustment
- Why Smart people defend bad ideas
- Irreverent review of ‘Why Smart People Can Be So Stupid’ by Robert J. Sternberg at salon.com
- ‘put whale-hunting rights up for auction, allowing both killers
and conservationists to bid. The chances are that those who prefer
whales to swim free would be able to outbid the few remaining humans
who like eating them.’ (economist article, paywalled) - Northern Green Gathering festival
- Brad Warner’s Heart Sutra
- Red Deer spoken word antics audio archive
- The true story of the guy who tied ballons to his lawn chair so he could fly, and what happened to him (the straight dope)
- How to get from the UK to Ireland by train and ferry
- ‘As they predicted, Kim and Hatfield found a significant positive correlation between level of companionate love and life satisfaction (beta=.34), while there was no correlation between passionate love and life satisfaction.’
- ‘The transvestites first appeared in March when they raided Magazine Street like a marauding army of kleptomaniacal showgirls, said Davis, using clockwork precision and brute force to satisfy high-end boutique needs.’
- Martin Sereno’s presentation on Peak Oil (via onemonkey.org)
- See also: Richard Heinberg, The Party’s Over: Oil, War, and the Fate of Industrial Societies
Multilateralism in an age of decline
It is, then, conceivable that we could be in for a period in which a synchronised upswing in the global economy turns into a synchronised downturn, as weaker demand from the US ripples out to the export-driven economies of Asia and the Eurozone. Protectionism will then exacerbate the recession. To which the response might be: a good thing, too. If, as Al Gore was arguing during his visit to London last week, the world is on the brink of ecological catastrophe, we ought to lose our fixation with growth and concentrate on self-sufficiency and sustainability instead…..From this standpoint, anything that throws sand in the wheels of the globalisation juggernaut is welcome. What we need is a full-scale cathartic crisis that will enable a new and better world to emerge.
It might not be that easy. True, a collapse of the Doha round, and a sharp contraction in global growth, could provide two of the elements that brought about change in the mid-20th century. But in the 1930s, the progression of events did not go stock market crash, recession, new world order. It went stock market crash, financial collapse, beggar-my-neighbour devaluation, protectionism, fascism, world war, new world order.
Clearly, the solution to Gore’s looming environmental Armageddon has to be collective, rather than unilateral. There is no way that the US, for example, is going to take action to cut carbon emissions unless it is sure every other country is doing likewise.
Yet the chances of multilateral action will be diminished in a climate of fear generated by economic weakness. The report on the economics of climate change currently being undertaken by Nick Stern at the UK Treasury is likely to conclude that the costs associated with a reduction in the emissions to the levels deemed safe by scientists are relatively modest. Gore himself believes that tackling climate change will be good for business, opening up plenty of new opportunities to make money.
That’s as may be. Multilateralism is a delicate plant; it does not thrive in harsh climates and the same impulses that drive countries to put up trade barriers when times get tough will persuade policymakers to listen to the special interest groups arguing that the price of tackling climate change is too high. The growth-at-all-costs lobby will be strengthened.
Delayed, but there is a day of reckoning Larry Elliot in the Guardian, 26 June 2006.
enriching the blogosphere
Two new blogs now enrich the blogosphere (warning: personal bias forthcoming)
To mark the start of his PhD, Dan is now blogging at coveredinbees.org about the science of self-organisation/’spontaneous order’ and how it affects political philosophy, and about markets and freedom. And about the war on terror and the state of the world. Read his introductory post to see where he’s coming from.
Sarah Eldridge, is now blogging as part of her work with ICAR (The Information Centre about Asylum and Refugees in the UK). ICAR “is an independent information and research organisation’ based at City University which aims ‘to increase public understanding of asylum issues in the UK, and inform policy and practice through applied research and policy evaluation.’ The blog comments on how asylum issues are handled in the media.
Quote #154
I have a rendezvous with Death
At some disputed barricade,
At midnight in some flaming town,
Save the Cemetery Chapel
[local news warning]
The conspiracy of planners and property developers to turn the whole world into yuppie flats for contemporary urban living ™ reaches the Sheffield General Cemetery – they want to convert the anglican chapel, fencing off the top entrance to the cemetery and enclosing the surrounding land in the process.
Petition here: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/saveourchapel
Look out for a benefit gig in the cemetery grounds on the 9th of July….
my wikipedia contrail
My wikipedia contail (after Matt Webb) – those autocomplete options when I type “en.wikipedia.org/wiki/” into my browser
- Charles Murray (author)
- Coase Theorem
- Lewontin’s Fallacy
- Race
- Race and Intelligence
- The Bell Curve
- Validity of human races
- FUD (‘Fear Uncertainty and Doubt’)
- Howard Wilkinson
- Wolfgang Bauer
In the 1970s Philip Knightly and the Sunday Times Insight team were pursuing the story of how thalidomide, which caused severe birth defects, was marketed as morning-sickness pill.
…the Sunday Times advertising manager, Donald Barrett had warned [Sunday Times editor] Harold Evans that Distillers [who had marketed thalidomide in the UK] was the paper’s single largest advertiser, spending £600,000 a year. Then he added, ‘I know that won’t stop you and it shouldn’t.’ Immediately the Sunday Times began its campaign, Distillers cancelled all its advertising….
Quoted from A Hack’s Progress by Philip Knightley, excerpted in Tell me no lies: Investigative Journalism and its triumphs, edited by John Pilger.
links for 14th of June 2006
- I don’t like talking about music,” Martha Wainwright sets out her stall. “I don’t like being like, ‘This song should feel like there’s an angel coming up from the earth’. Just sing the fucking song. And if it is like an angel coming up from the earth then we don’t have to fucking talk about it.”
- Supposing … Bono’s too annoying to save the world
- GO Sheffo! in the guardian
- a midlife year out story
- An atheist website – with some interesting notes about how belief affects reasoning
- what makes urban legends stick (and how to use this for marketing)
- On International Towel Day fans of Douglas Adams’ Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy carry their towels with them all day
- Rob Newman’s History of Oil (google video)
- Edge #182 has Daniel Gilbert talking about happiness and science
- Photo essay about Festonia squat community
- Wired article about RFID hacking – possible troubling implications for govt. id card scheme?
- ‘many of the central ideals of the Enlightenment were lost to the rise of the modern nation state’
an interesting thought in a CT post about Madeline Bunting - An ecological study of glee in small groups of preschool children.
- But you have one thing that may save you, and that is your youth. This is your great strength. It is also why I hate and fear you. What if Stephen Colbert did your graduation address?
- The The 17 Basic Techniques of Tomiki Aikido University of Winchester aikido society (IE only?)
- Matt Webb’s Reboot8 talk ‘Making Senses’
- Matt Webb’s talk about science fiction and artifacts
- ‘The man shouted, ‘God will save me, if he exists,’ lowered himself by a rope into the enclosure, took his shoes off and went up to the lions,” the official said.’
- Five Ways to Kill a Man
This is absolutely key
The most important difference between evolutionists and creationists, Prof Jones concluded, is that scientists are always prepared to say, “I don’t know”.
“If there weren’t any unknown parts of evolution, bits we don’t understand, it wouldn’t be a science,” he said, “That’s one thing that believers never say, because it’s all written down in a big book.”
(Steve Jones speaking at the Hay Festival)
The crucial difference between creationism and evolution is not that one provides a better fit of the data than the other. The difference is that one is a generative, empirically-driven, scientific theory and the other isn’t. As a research programme, Creationism isn’t even wrong. Science helps you work out what you don’t know, and how you’re going to move into a position of knowing it. Creationism has no account of what isn’t known or of how to go about finding it out.
If it wasn’t for us…
Extract from Gary Younge’s new book Stranger in a Strange Land
I have always found America exciting; but, for better or worse, never exceptional. Its efforts at global domination seemed like a plot development in the narrative of European empire rather than a break from it. Even as the French lambasted secretary of state Colin Powell’s presentation to the Security Council, protesters in Abidjan, the capital of Ivory Coast, waved American flags and placards saying: “Bush please help Ivory Coast against French terrorism.” There was precious little moral high ground to go round. Yet everyone, it seemed, was making a stake on it.
So it was with great bemusement that I found myself having to absorb abuse from white, rightwing Americans, who harked back to the Declaration of Independence of 1776 and the second world war to justify military aggression in Iraq. They badgered me as though their own reference points represented the sole prism through which global events could possibly be understood. As if the struggle for moral superiority between Europe and the US could have any relevance to someone whose ancestors were brought to the Americas as slaves and whose parents and grandparents lived through the war under European colonisation.
“If it wasn’t for us, you would be speaking German,” they would say. “No, if it wasn’t for you,” I would tell them, “I would probably be speaking Yoruba.”
Links for 18th of May 2006
- Fountain of Age – famous people photoshopped to look very old
- proof of the quadratic formula
- ‘Freedom for corporations actually also means greater powers for government, since it accustoms citizens to being treated as disposable playthings’
- ‘The BNP said: “Barnbrook is not a queer. The film is not pornographic. It is what is called an arty farty film.”‘
- planecrashinfo.com
- The Mathematical Cartoons of Larry Gonick
- Russian Parkour video
- We will call it experimental philosophy or… x-phi!
- ‘you have to live with death to be able to love’ Photo essay about life in Brazial Favelas
- Gypsy Folk Tales by Francis Hindes Groome [1899]
- ‘this helpful video will evade all your questions’ Lisa Simpson takes on creationism
- deprogramming from the academic cult
- ‘the gypsies are a tradition of proud nomadic pastoralism and adrenal intercourse with reality that predates this beleaguered experiment called civilization…The last 15 thousand years of neurotic disequilibrium is the story of people standing still harassing and persecuting those who are always on the move.’
- Love in the age of INGSOC T-shirt design from studentsfororwell.org
- The real-life Edukators – Hamburg’s ‘Robin Hood Gang’
Quote #152
“But I don’t want to go among mad people,” Alice remarked.
“Oh, you can’t help that,” said the Cat: “we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.”
“How do you know I’m mad?” said Alice.
“You must be,” said the Cat, “or you wouldn’t have come here.”
Lewis Carroll, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
use of terms
Isn’t it peculiar that, among democrats, the word ‘populist’ is used as a term of abuse?
the capacity for bewilderment
The truth is that we are only potentially homo sapiens. We are set apart from the animals precisely by the fact that we are born without any clear guide as to how to deal adequately with the problems of our human condition. The great marvel and misery of humanity is this capacity for bewilderment. This is not, of course, to deny that human being have instincts; it is to affirm the fact that each of us is required to find our own non-instinctual answers to the problems of life, free and happiness (instinct is silent in the face of all the above questions). The sum total of answers we give to the problem of our relationship with the universe, we call religion
David Edwards, Free to be human – intellectual self-defence in an age of illusions, p12
we’re dancing animals
Kurt Vonnergut talking about when he tells his wife he’s going out to buy an envelope:
Oh, she says well, you’re not a poor man. You know, why don’t you go online and buy a hundred envelopes and put them in the closet? And so I pretend not to hear her. And go out to get an envelope because I’m going to have a hell of a good time in the process of buying one envelope. I meet a lot of people. And, see some great looking babes. And a fire engine goes by. And I give them the thumbs up. And, and ask a woman what kind of dog that is. And, and I don’t know. The moral of the story is, is we’re here on Earth to fart around. And, of course, the computers will do us out of that. And, what the computer people don’t realize, or they don’t care, is we’re dancing animals. You know, we love to move around. And, we’re not supposed to dance at all anymore.
Interview Public Broadcasting Service (2005)